Muller v. Jewell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This is an action to recover possession of fifty head of cattle, and for damages for the detention thereof. Issue was joined on all the material averments of the complaint. The cause was tried by a jury, and they returned the following verdict:
“ We, the jury, find in favor of the defendants .for one-half of the G O cattle.”
The verdict did not respond to the issues joined in the cause. The verdict was in favor of the defendants for one-half of the cattle sued for, and was entirely silent as to the other half. Assuming that the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict for the other half, the jury…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crites v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tou Velle v. Farm Bureau Co-op. ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Ryan v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- American States Public Service Co. v. RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935