Legal Opinion
Luttrell v. Roger Holler Chevrolet
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 15, 1993No. 92-786PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
625 So.2d 921 (1993)
Robert LUTTRELL, Appellant,
v.
ROGER HOLLER CHEVROLET, and Crum & Forster, Appellees.
No. 92-786.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
October 15, 1993.
Bill McCabe, Longwood, for appellant.
Mark S. Spangler, Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett & Hurt, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.
ERVIN, Judge.
Claimant appeals from a workers' compensation order denying his claim for indemnity benefits from the date of maximum medical improvement (MMI), incidental costs, penalties, interest, and attorney's fees, arguing that in denying the claim, the judge of compensation claims (JCC)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Samuel Duncan, Jr., Grace Duncan, Gay Nell Duncan, Marshall Sutton, Angela F. Turner, Arthur D. Wilson, and Oscar L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Evans v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Quinn v. MillardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- ESCAMBIA CTY. COUNCIL v. GoldsmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- McCabe v. Bechtel Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Echelbarger v. Carpenter Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Smith v. School Board of Polk CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Muir v. Charlotte County School BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Murphy v. Northeast DrywallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Purvis v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994