Legal Opinion

CMI Roadbuilding Inc v. Specsys Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 2024No. 5:18-cv-01245Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CMI ROADBUILDING, INC. and ) CMI ROADBUILDING LTD., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-18-1245-G ) SPECSYS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Now before the Court is the Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 491) filed by Plaintiff CMI Roadbuilding, Inc. (“CMI”). Defendant SpecSys, Inc. has submitted a response in opposition (Doc. No. 508). I. Background Plaintiff initiated this diversity action on December 20, 2018. See Doc. No. 1. This lawsuit stems from a series of purchase orders whereby Defendant agreed to manufacture mobile…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lippoldt v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Kay v. Venezuelan Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API