Hurst v. J. M. Griffin & Sons, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentLee, J.
Since I can neither agree to, nor acquiesce in, the reversal of this cause, with deference, I feel compelled to give my reasons therefor.
It is elemental that a Chancellor’s finding of fact should be sustained on appeal, if supported by substantial evidence; and that such finding will not be set aside unless manifestly wrong.
When this rule is kept in mind, the decision of the learned Chancellor, as I see it, is impervious to change for at least two complementary reasons: (A) The deed to Pace constituted color of title; and (B) Appellees’ title was established by adverse possession.
On the first…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moelle v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Peeples v. BotkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
- Leach v. BeattieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- Chapman v. SimsMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Native Lumber Co. v. ElmerMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.