Schnell v. Appling
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This is a proceeding to enjoin the Secretary of State from placing an initiative measure upon the ballot for the general elections to be held November 3, 1964.
The plaintiffs contended that a measure which would substantially change the Workmen’s Compensation Law was ineligible for inclusion on the ballot because of alleged defects in the initiating petition. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and the plaintiffs appeal.
The proposed legislation was made a part of the petition. The measure is drafted in the form ordinarily employed in bills introduced in the Legislative…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Barnes v. PaulusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Kerr v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Harris v. KeislingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Barnes v. PaulusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.