Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Upshur

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*501OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 In this case we consider whether the electronic media enjoys either a common law or constitutional right of access, before trial, to a copy of an audiotape played during a preliminary hearing where the Commonwealth introduced the audiotape as part of its prima facie case. On appeal, the Commonwealth argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it found that a local television station’s interest in obtaining the audiotape was greater than the Commonwealth’s interest in prosecuting the case and protecting the defendant’s right to a fair trial. We conclude…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. CridenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. UpshurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. PA ChildCare LLC v. FloodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. UpshurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. UpshurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. UpshurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API