Legal Opinion
People v. Milton
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 2013PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Lippman.
At issue in this appeal is whether a superior court information (SCI) is jurisdictionally defective where it names victims not identified in the felony complaint. We conclude that the SCI in the present case was not defective.
*135Defendant Jacob Milton was charged with grand larceny in the first degree and two counts of a scheme to defraud in the first degree, among numerous other crimes. The felony complaint alleged that between April 1, 2006 and October 16, 2007, defendant met with four mortgage loan applicants (named in the complaint) and acquired their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. McLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- 107166 People v. DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. SealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SiminionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.