Legal Opinion

James v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 29, 2002No. 13-01-491-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice RODRIGUEZ.

Appellant, Bruce Montague James, brings this appeal following a conviction for the offense of assault. By three points of error, James contends: (1) the facilities used for his trial proceedings did not conform with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); (2) the trial court committed error in sentencing James when no proof was adduced proving the trial court had jurisdiction; and (3) the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial because the prosecutor injected insinuations of an alleged extraneous offense. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

James, who has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ovalle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Waldo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  2. Gunter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  3. Abram Harker Jeffs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  4. Abram Harker Jeffs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  5. Angela Kuhn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API