James v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice RODRIGUEZ.
Appellant, Bruce Montague James, brings this appeal following a conviction for the offense of assault. By three points of error, James contends: (1) the facilities used for his trial proceedings did not conform with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); (2) the trial court committed error in sentencing James when no proof was adduced proving the trial court had jurisdiction; and (3) the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial because the prosecutor injected insinuations of an alleged extraneous offense. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
James, who has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ovalle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Waldo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
- Gunter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Abram Harker Jeffs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
- Abram Harker Jeffs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
- Angela Kuhn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.