In re J.T.M.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rulon, J.:
This is an appeal by two juveniles, J.T.M. and M.N.M., respondents, who argue the district court did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate them as juvenile offenders on charges of aggravated battery because the charging documents were defective. Respondents specifically claim the court erred in allowing the State to amend the complaints to cure the defect, denying their request for discovery, denying their request for a juiy trial, and permitting a co-respondent to testify. We affirm.
The facts of this case are essentially undisputed and are as follows:
Respondents were each charged as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haddock v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- State v. BourassaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
- In re S.M.D.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
- Walker v. SAGA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.