Legal Opinion

Finn v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1984No. Civ. 34292PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

This writ proceeding to test the superior court’s refusal to dismiss an information presents a classic illustration of the legal axiom that a specific statute prevails over a general one, the so called “Swarm-Gilbert” or “Williamson” rule in the law of crimes of California.

I

Norman Finn is a mobilehome dealer. Phyllis Wingett listed her furnished mobilehome at the Saltón Sea with him. The listing agreement provided Wingett was to net $10,000, and Finn was to retain any excess as his commission.

Finn found a buyer who paid $13,500 for the mobilehome unfurnished. He told Wingett…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. SwannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. Sun, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997
  4. People v. MejiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. MejiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API