Finn v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY, J.
This writ proceeding to test the superior court’s refusal to dismiss an information presents a classic illustration of the legal axiom that a specific statute prevails over a general one, the so called “Swarm-Gilbert” or “Williamson” rule in the law of crimes of California.
I
Norman Finn is a mobilehome dealer. Phyllis Wingett listed her furnished mobilehome at the Saltón Sea with him. The listing agreement provided Wingett was to net $10,000, and Finn was to retain any excess as his commission.
Finn found a buyer who paid $13,500 for the mobilehome unfurnished. He told Wingett…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. SwannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. Sun, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997
- People v. MejiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. MejiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.