Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In this action between two insurance companies the plaintiff seeks partial reimbursement from an alleged coinsurer for amounts paid to satisfy a judgment entered against plaintiff’s insured. The District Court found in plaintiff’s favor. We agree with the reasoning of Judge Marsh below that “the accident occurred in the course of operations performed for the named insured (Latrobe) by the independent contractor (Dill),” and that the hazard involved was covered by the policy issued by plaintiff’s coinsurer (Ocean). 261 F.Supp. 223, 226 (W.D. Pa.1966).
Latrobe Brewing Company…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Manufacturers Casualty Insurance v. Goodville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. HilderbrandtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
4Cited by19 opinions
- Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. McCabeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Consolidation Coal Co., Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.