Legal Opinion

Kearns v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 22, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Dallas Circuit Comt. Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the employment of defendant as a brakeman. There was a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. •

1Opinion of the Court

Beoic, Cii. J.

I. The plaintiff, while in the employment of defendant, and in the discharge of his duty as á brakeman upon a freight train, was required to assist in moving certain cars at a way station. The cars to be moved were on a side track passing along the platform of the station-house, which was situated between the main track and this side track. It was necessary for plaintiff to accompany the engine to the cai’S intended to be moved. He rode upon one of the cars past the platform, and was required to descend by the ladder for the purpose of uncoupling the cars, or some of them, and,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. George v. Iowa & Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Coles v. Union Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Robel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Hemmingsen v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Iola Portland Cement Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API