Norton v. Home Insurance Company
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
Defendant’s appeal from a judgment awarding damages to the plaintiff brings before us again the knotty issue of the effectiveness of a time limitation clause within which suit must be brought on an insurance policy. Hubert v. National Casualty Company, 154 Me. 94, 144 A.2d 119 (1958); Dolbier v. Agricultural Ins. Co., 67 Me. 180 (1877).
We deny the appeal.
The parties have stipulated the factual framework in which the problem arises.
Plaintiff, a Maine resident, purchased and received an insurance policy issued by the defendant on October 28, 1968.
The defendant is a New York…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Insurance Co. of North America v. BrimIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Karnes v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Dunton v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
- Town of Highland Park v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoekstra v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- L & a United Grocers, Inc. v. Safeguard InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983