Legal Opinion

Norton v. Home Insurance Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 6, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

Defendant’s appeal from a judgment awarding damages to the plaintiff brings before us again the knotty issue of the effectiveness of a time limitation clause within which suit must be brought on an insurance policy. Hubert v. National Casualty Company, 154 Me. 94, 144 A.2d 119 (1958); Dolbier v. Agricultural Ins. Co., 67 Me. 180 (1877).

We deny the appeal.

The parties have stipulated the factual framework in which the problem arises.

Plaintiff, a Maine resident, purchased and received an insurance policy issued by the defendant on October 28, 1968.

The defendant is a New York…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. BrimIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Karnes v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Dunton v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  5. Town of Highland Park v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoekstra v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  2. Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. L & a United Grocers, Inc. v. Safeguard InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API