Legal Opinion

Raney v. Baron

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Eeeoe to Franklin Circuit Court. ‘ ■ This case was tried' at Spring Term, 1846,. of Franklin Circuit Court, Judge Douglas presiding. Debt on an appeal bond, of which following is copy t.

Read the full summary

Eeeoe to Franklin Circuit Court. ‘ ■ This case was tried' at Spring Term, 1846,. of Franklin Circuit Court, Judge Douglas presiding. Debt on an appeal bond, of which following is copy t. TeKEITOEY OP FLORIDA, } - Franklin County. $ Know all men by these presents, that we, the Southern Life Insurance and Trust Company, and George Field and David G. Raney, are held and firmly bound unto Isaac S. Jacques in the sum of two thousand dollars, for the true payment whereof we bind ourselves, our and each of our heirs, executors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, sealed with…

1Opinion of the Court

Macrae, Justice:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin county, rendered in an action of debt, instituted there in by Samuel Baron, administrator of Isaac S. Jacques, deceased, against David G. Raney, as one of the sureties of the Southern Life Insurance and Trust Company, in an appeal bond executed by it to the plaintiff’s intestate.

To the declaration the defendant pleaded payment, and upon the issue joined upon this plea, verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff, for the sum of seven hundred and seventy dollars.

The main ground of error, set up by the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FreelU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Gore v. MontagueSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. Jennings v. BobeSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Eureka Fire & Marine Ins. v. BaldwinCuyahoga Circuit Court · 1898
  5. Eureka Fire & Marine Insurance v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API