Burke & James, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Judge
Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, expert in the manufacture of cameras and photographic supplies, asserts in this suit a balance due under the terms of a written contract with the defendant. Plaintiff’s argument is addressed primarily to the wording of the contract contending that the clause in dispute is one factor, mutually agreed upon, as the consideration for the performance of the contract, and as such is binding upon the parties. The facts in the case, about which there is no controversy, disclose a situation which obviously renders the claim inequitable and we think illegal. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Bassick v. Ætna Explosives Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Endel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
- J. J. Preis & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Aviation Contractor Employees, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Flippin Materials Company, a Joint Venture Composed of Brown and Root, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Kling Bros. & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939