Legal Opinion

Franklin Savings & Trust Co. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1925No. Appeal, 39PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Defendant had endorsed a promissory note held by plaintiff and payable at its banking house. The maker was a depositor in the holder bank, having two accounts, one individual and the other “John W. Garland, Spe eial.” On the day of maturity of the note the individual account was slightly overdrawn; the “special” account had a balance of $102.39. The holder, during that day, received for collection from the maker two checks aggregating $12,500, drawn on New York and Pittsburgh banks, for deposit to the “special” account; it was credited with the proceeds.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Butcher v. ButlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Pattison v. . Syracuse National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Commercial National Bank v. HenningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Peoples' Bank v. LegrandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Congress Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Franklin Trust Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. First National Consumer Discount Co. v. McCrossanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. National Bank of Germantown & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Jairett v. First Montauk Securities Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API