Legal Opinion
Long Island Lighting Co. v. Trigen-Nassau Energy Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*210OPINION OF THE COURT
Allan L. Winick, J.
Application by petitioner Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) to stay the arbitration noticed by respondent TrigenNassau Energy Corp. (Trigen) pursuant to CPLR article 78 is denied.
Pursuant to the Parallel Generation Agreement (the Agreement) between LILCO and Trigen dated December 28, 1988 as amended, LILCO agreed during the term of the Agreement, and any renewal or extension thereof, "to purchase and accept from Seller the Electricity produced at Seller’s Facility”. Electricity is defined in article 1 (G) of the Agreement as "the total amount of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Fallon & Greater Johnstown School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Xiox Corp. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greater Missoula Area Federation of Early Childhood Educators & Related Personnel v. Child Start, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Greater Missoula Area Federation of Early Childhood Educators & Related Personnel v. Child Start, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Greater Missoula v. Child Start IMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Greater Missoula v. Child Start IMontana Supreme Court · 2009