Legal Opinion

Briody v. Whalen

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdward S. Conway, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding brought by the petitioners for a judgment to declare illegal respondents’ attempt to retroactively reduce petitioners’ Medicaid reimbursement rates, and permanently enjoin respondents from taking such action without a due process hearing.

Petitioners are the operators of a nursing home facility located in Lockport, New York, licensed by the State of New York pursuant to article 28 of the Public Health Law. The facility is reimbursed by the State of New York for certain expenses incurred in accepting Medicaid patients under the Federal Medicaid program pursuant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coral Gables Convalescent Home, Inc. v. RichardsonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
  2. Broadacres Skilled Nursing Facility v. IngrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Birnbaum v. WhalenNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Claim of Sankal v. Park Avenue SynagogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Briody v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API