In Re Application of Freygang
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
These proceedings raised the sole question whether the statute was duly passed by the Legislature or otherwise made effective by law in the manner required by the Constitution. The essential premise of the appellants’ attack is that the act was a special law within Art. IY, Sec. YII, pa/r. 10 of the Constitution. We agree with the Appellate Division that the nomenclature adopted by the Legislature is not conclusive or decisive, and that the operative provisions of the act bring it within the category of a general law. It is not disputed that the mechanics of enactment pertinent to general…
2Cited by32 opinions
- Township of Mahwah v. Bergen County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Newark Superior Officers Ass'n v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Paul Kimball Hospital, Inc. v. Brick Township Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.