Legal Opinion

Succession of Vance

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1887No. 9817PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Tissot, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

This is a suit by the city of NeAv Orleans for the ■recovery of a legacy made for the benefit of the indigent insane in her ■charge.

The defense is, that there is no such bequest in the will; that, Avhile -there Avas a gift to a certain named institution, “The Insane Asylum,” .yet, before acceptance, or demand for the legacy, this institution passed out of existence, leaving no representative; that, having voluntarily abolished the asylum, the city has deprived herself of the only character in Avhich she had any right to receive the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. President of the Schuylkill Navigation Co. v. KitteraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Succession of Abraham.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Succession of FisherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Succession of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. In Re Succession of MilneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Succession of TiltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API