Swearingin v. Rendigs, Jr., Admr.

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.

It is claimed here that the court erred for two reasons.(1) It is urged that this claim being upon a judgment, it was not necessary t< present it to the administrator for allowance. It seems to us a sufficient answer to this contention to say that the claim was presented and rejected, and neither §10509-133, GC, prescribing that actions upon rejected claims must be brought within two months, nor §10509-144, GC, prescribing that no administrator shall be held to answer to the suit of any creditor unless it be commenced within two months after the expiration of nine months…