Legal Opinion

Rescia v. Eastern Connecticut State University (In re Harnett)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 30, 2016No. CASE No. 14-32223 (JAM); ADV. PRO. No. 15-03025 (JAM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS

Julie A. Manning, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

On March 4, 2016, the Defendant, Eastern Connecticut State University (“ECSU”), filed an Amended Motion to Dismiss seeking to dismiss Count Two of the Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 27). The Amended Motion to Dismiss asserts that Count Two should be dismissed because the doctrine of sovereign immunity shields ECSU from the Plaintiffs avoidance claim. For the reasons discussed below, the Amended Motion to Dismiss is denied.

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. The Complaint,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Central Virginia Community College v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. The United States of AmericaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API