Legal Opinion
Kohler v. Humphrey
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1949No. 12662PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The original nature of the case sufficiently appears in Kohler v. McClellan, 5 Cir., 156 F.2d 908. It was there treated as a stockholders’ derivative action in behalf of the corporation (referred to as Crescent) against McClellan, who was a director and the president of the corporation, and against other persons, some of whom were also directors. Crescent was by amendment made a party, and service made on its secretary, but it filed no pleadings. A general dismissal of the suit was by this court affirmed as to “all the defendants except McClellan on all causes of action…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kohler v. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tucker v. National Linen Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Robinson v. Snell's Limbs and Braces of New Orleans, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Tucker v. New Orleans Laundries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.