Legal Opinion
United States v. Fleet National Bank (In re Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 27, 2001No. Bankruptcy Nos. 00-20845, 00-20846; Adversary Nos. 01-2026, 01-2027PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*734 RULING DENYING MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
The United States of America, acting on behalf of the United States Mint (“the Mint”), on May 7, 2001, filed two amended complaints (“the complaint” or “the complaints”) in the jointly-administered Chapter 11 cases of Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc. (“HHRG”) and Attleboro Refining Company, Inc. (“ARC”). One complaint contains twelve counts against five defendants — Fleet National Bank and Fleet Precious Metals, Inc. (together, “Fleet”), HHRG, ARC and Credit Suisse First Boston International…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schiavone v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Bernard C. Duse, Jr. v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- In Re Sitkin Smelting and Refining, Inc. Eastman Kodak Company v. G. M. Harrison, Trustee and C. I. T. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Calogera Abbruscato v. Empire Blue Cross And Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- B. A. Ballou & Co. v. CitytrustSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Miami Metals I, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Miami Metals I, Inc., et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2021