Hutchinson v. Hampton
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from the First District, Madison Bounty. The parties stipulated in writing that this cause should be heard on appeal on the original papers. The appellants appealed from the judgment of the district court, Hosmer, J., affirming the report of the referee in favor of Hutchinson. The facts are contained in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Warren, O. J.
This appears upon the calendar as an action in which Hutchinson is plaintiff and appellee, and Columbus Hampton and others are defendants and appellants. It appears from the record that Norval Harrison et al. were plaintiffs, and J. M. Chase et al. defendants in an action pending in the first judicial district court, in Madison county, and that Hutchinson was appointed, by consent of parties, receiver of the property in controversy in that cause, and that he acted as such ; and applied, at the termination of his duties, to the court for the allowance to him of $330, as…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Heinze v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Hickey v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
- Bassick Min. Co. v. SchoolfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- State ex rel. Cornue v. LindsayMontana Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.