Legal Opinion

Danoff v. Danoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 1987No. 4-86-1659PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We find that the trial court erred in holding that appellant was responsible for the entire balance of the medical bill and the tuition in question, as these obligations were not incorporated into the final judgment. See Aylward v. Aylward, 420 So.2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). See also Agudo v. Agudo, 411 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). However, we find that the terms of the final judgment encompass the medical bill even though it accrued prior to the final judgment, hold that appellant is responsible for that portion of the medical bill covered by the insurance and medical payment provisions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Agudo v. AgudoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Aylward v. AylwardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Dirienzo-Gluhareff v. GluhareffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API