Legal Opinion · Dissent
Case v. Panzarella
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 15, 1942Published
1DissentHammer, J.
I dissent and vote for affirmance. In supplementary proceedings Case & Smith, general creditors on a judgment [of the Municipal Court of the City of New York] for $262.23 obtained November 18,1940 against Paul Panzarella, on June 14, 1941 served a subpoena with restraint against transfer upon one Drago, a third party [Civ. Prac. Act, § 781]. As owner he was improving his real property through contractors Panzarella So Son, a partnership of which Paul Panzarella was the principal partner. Anderson Brick So Supply Co., Inc., furnished materials which were used in the improvement and on June 12,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lauer v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Amiesite Construction Corp. v. Luciano Contracting & Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Corbin-Kellogg Agency, Inc. v. TaskerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Hirshfield v. LudwigNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.