Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1929No. A-6448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Stephens county, Oklahoma, upon a charge of embezzling certain personal property, to wit, one hog, of the value of $22.84. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged, and assessed the punishment at imprisonment for one year in the penitentiary. The defendant, in his motion for a new trial, sets out nine separate errors alleged to- have been committed by the trial court.

Counsel for defendant in his brief argues only the first and fifth specifications of error; the first being: “The verdict of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Summers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API