Smith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Stephens county, Oklahoma, upon a charge of embezzling certain personal property, to wit, one hog, of the value of $22.84. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged, and assessed the punishment at imprisonment for one year in the penitentiary. The defendant, in his motion for a new trial, sets out nine separate errors alleged to- have been committed by the trial court.
Counsel for defendant in his brief argues only the first and fifth specifications of error; the first being: “The verdict of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Summers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940