Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1985No. 844SC203PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Though this appeal is from an interlocutory order, it is nevertheless authorized under the provisions of G.S. 1-277 and G.S. 7A-27(d). Because the right against self-incrimination is a very substantial right, indeed, protected by both the United States and North Carolina Constitutions, and if some of the interrogatories are incriminating, as defendant contends, and he is nevertheless compelled to answer them now his constitutional right could be lost beyond recall and his appeal at the end of the trial would be of no value. Stone v. Martin, 56 N.C. App. 473, 289 S.E. 2d 898,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Allred v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Stone v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Norris v. SattlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Leonard v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Fields v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. In re Inspection of Galvan Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API