Legal Opinion
United States v. 133 Cases of Tomato Paste
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 3, 1938No. 192PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, District Judge.
The United States has filed its libel- in this case seeking the confiscation and condemnation under the Food and Drugs Act, as amended, 21 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., of .133 cases, more or less, each containing 100 cans of tomato paste, shipped by Harbor City Food Corporation from California to Cacciola Bros, in Philadelphia for sale. From the evidence I make the following special findings of fact: ■
The tomato paste in question was manufactured in July, 1935, by the Harbor City Food Corporation at its plant in Harborj City, Cal. The paste was manufactured, from tomatoes…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- A. O. Andersen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Galt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. 449 Cases, Containing Tomato PasteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Cassaro, Inc., and Salvatore CassaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- T. J. Stevenson & Co. v. 81,193 Bags of FlourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States of America, Libellant-Appellant v. 1,500 Cases More or Less, Tomato PasteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- United States v. 184 Barrels Dried Whole EggsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.