Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Nosworthy

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 23, 2010No. 2:07-cv-00771Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

VITALIANO, District Judge.

Defendant Paul Nosworthy, convicted after jury trial, has moved for a new trial and for a re-opened suppression hearing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. For the reasons set forth below, his motion is denied in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Familiarity with the facts is presumed. In brief, on September 20, 2009, Nosworthy was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Nosworthy contends that the government’s failure to disclose the 2007 suppression hearing testimony of New York Police…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API