Legal Opinion

Pryor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1992No. CR-90-1810PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant filed a Rule 20, A.R.Cr. P.Temp., now Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., petition, which was originally denied without a hearing by the trial court. Thereafter, the prosecutor filed an answer, stating certain grounds of preclusion, stating that the process and service of the process was insufficient, and denying the allegations in the petition. A hearing was then held by the trial court, and the trial court vacated its original order, which denied relief. Following the evidentiary hearing, the appellant's petition was again denied on the grounds that the appellant had failed to meet his burden…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Ex Parte CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Gaston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Roger Dale Ferguson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bagley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Deas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Ex Parte PfalzgrafCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API