Legal Opinion

Peerless Insurance v. Gould

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 27, 1960No. 4871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The findings of the Trial Court establish that at all material times the defendant Gould was engaged in several distinct enterprises. He operated Gould’s Sales & Service which consisted of a service station and repair shop, also used as a sales agency for used cars. In connection with this business he held a dealer’s license from the State of New Hampshire and was issued three sets of dealer’s registration plates. He was also engaged in a junk business in the course of which he bought damaged automobiles, using parts taken from them in the repair and service business, and selling what…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welborn v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  2. Kenner v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Casualty Underwriters, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
  4. Morrison v. Anchor Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Olson v. Standard Acc. Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Liberty Insurance Company v. SoulesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Cecere v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Indiana Insurance Company v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. Wescott v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  5. Cecere v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API