Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc. v. Eagerton
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HOBBS, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. Plaintiff bases jurisdiction in this Court on the grant of general federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and federal commerce clause jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1337. On February 12, 1982, the Court, sua sponte, raised the issue of whether it has subject matter jurisdiction over this cause. Specifically, the Court was concerned that the requirement that a federal question appear on the face of a “well-pleaded complaint” had not been met in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.