Board of Transportation v. Turner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Defendants Morrisette assert basically two grounds in support of their contention that they are entitled to all the proceeds: first, they contend that they retained, by an express exception in the October 1970 deed to the Turners, a fee simple interest in the right-of-way for ten (10) years; and second, they contend that by express language in the same exception, they reserved the right to all proceeds resulting from a condemnation of the right-of-way. While we do not agree with the first position taken by defendants Morrisette, we find merit in their second contention.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of MazzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Hughes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pacific Southwest Realty Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991