State v. Sein
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentWilentz, C.J.
I would hold that, under the statutory amendment, all purse snatchings are robberies, regardless of the amount of force used. I believe this construction of the amendment achieves the overriding goal of the Legislature: to deter and to prevent *219purse snatchings, not some kind, one kind, or a particular kind, but all purse snatchings.
I recognize the legitimacy of the majority’s decision. The issue of statutory interpretation facing the Court is difficult. But I cannot accept what I believe is an interpretation that falls far short of the legislative intent even in the face of the persuasive…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. MaguireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- State v. Des MaretsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- State v. Churchdale Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.