Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Sein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 21, 1991Published

1DissentWilentz, C.J.

I would hold that, under the statutory amendment, all purse snatchings are robberies, regardless of the amount of force used. I believe this construction of the amendment achieves the overriding goal of the Legislature: to deter and to prevent *219purse snatchings, not some kind, one kind, or a particular kind, but all purse snatchings.

I recognize the legitimacy of the majority’s decision. The issue of statutory interpretation facing the Court is difficult. But I cannot accept what I believe is an interpretation that falls far short of the legislative intent even in the face of the persuasive…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. MaguireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. State v. Des MaretsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. State v. Churchdale Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API