Legal Opinion

Kinnear v. Langley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 11, 1946No. 4-7840PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoFaddin, J.

Section 14525 of Pope’s Digest is sometimes referred to as the ‘‘pretermitted child” statute. Appellant claimed to he the pretermitted child of Mrs. Helen Burdick, deceased, and, relying on that claim, filed suit in the Garland chancery court. From a decision adverse to her claim, she brings this appeal. We will interchangeably refer to the appellant as Hazel Wade, Hazel Burdick, and Hazel Burdick Kinnear: the identity is the same.

Hazel Wade was born in April, 1892, in Labette county, Kansas, being a daughter of William Wade and Ida Wade. Mr. Wade worked for Mr. Burdick, and the families were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. NelmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. In Re Phillips' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bryan v. BigelowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Gerrish v. GerrishOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Bemis v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Montgomery v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Taylor v. CammackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. In re Estate of OsgoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Minton v. MintonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API