Legal Opinion

Perry Franks v. Cherry Lindamood

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 22, 2010No. 07-6272UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Perry Franks appeals the order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Franks alleges that grant of the writ is warranted because his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to file a motion to withdraw his plea of guilty after Franks requested that he do so. He argues that his attorney’s failure to file should be presumed prejudicial under Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000). For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s denial of the writ.

I

On…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Plumaj v. BookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  2. Franks v. LindamoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Reeves v. FloydDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. Thomas Kelly Ballard, III v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
  5. Valentine v. SettlesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API