Perry Franks v. Cherry Lindamood
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Perry Franks appeals the order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Franks alleges that grant of the writ is warranted because his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to file a motion to withdraw his plea of guilty after Franks requested that he do so. He argues that his attorney’s failure to file should be presumed prejudicial under Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000). For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s denial of the writ.
I
On…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Plumaj v. BookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Franks v. LindamoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Reeves v. FloydDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Thomas Kelly Ballard, III v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Valentine v. SettlesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019