Legal Opinion
Zerounis v. Berry
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 10, 1945No. 15157PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
The plaintiffs in error argue the general grounds of the motion, and contend that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict for the reason that there had been no dissolution of the partnership and no balance had been struck. Whether or not this question can be raised by a motion for new trial when no demurrer was filed to the petition, we do not here decide. Suffice it to say, there is in no event any merit in this contention. This court, in Hogan v. Walsh, 122 Ga. 283, 285 (50 S. E. 84), said: '•“The suit of Walsh against Hogan was an equitable action. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sankey & Shorter v. Columbus Iron WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Bennett v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Hogan v. WalshSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Phillips v. Trowbridge Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- People's National Bank v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ghee v. KimseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986