Legal Opinion

Cowling v. Greenleaf

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for Rehearing. The plaintiff in error filed a motion for a rehearing in Cowling v. Greenleaf, (reported in 32 Kas. 392, et seq., wherein the facts are stated.) The opinion herein was filed at the May 1885 session of .the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Ouriam:

This case was tried by the court without a jury. The court made its findings of fact and conclusions of law upon the evidence introduced, and no evidence is preserved in the record. The complaint is, that this court should have construed the following words of the contract: “ But it is expressly agreed between the parties that if at any time during the said period of three years either of these parties shall have just cause so to do, he may annul this contract.” The contention of plaintiff is, that under the terms of the contract either party had the right to annul the contract for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shuler v. LashhornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. People's Gas Co. v. FletcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Lesan Advertising Co. v. CastlemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API