Legal Opinion
Burch v. Kaiser
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 30, 1990No. 72010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BAILEY, Judge:
Appellant Archie Burch (Appellant or Inmate) seeks review of the Trial Court’s denying Inmate’s Petition for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus/Mandamus, by which Inmate sought relief from the administrative imposition of sanctions for alleged misconduct. Herein, Inmate asserts in essence (1) violation of his due process and equal protection guarantees in the conduct of the Department of Corrections’ administrative hearing and review process, and (2) insufficiency of the evidence to support imposition of sanctions.
Inmate asserts that while housed at the Jess Dunn…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William Chavis v. Charles J. Rowe, Director, Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Prock v. District Court of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Henry v. MahlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claudie Wallace v. R. Michael Cody Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Richard Paul Lamb v. Steve HargettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995