Legal Opinion
Furlow v. Maison Blanche Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 1925No. 9708PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.
The very large amount claimed in the petition and allowed by the verdict and judgment herein, and the prominence of counsel engaged, have given this case more than ordinary importance and have caused us to peruse with more than ordinary care the voluminous transcript and briefs in this case.
*352The plaintiff alleges that she was in-, jured through the fault of defendants’ employees. Of course, the burden of proof is upon her to' establish the injury she complains of with reasonable certainty and by a preponderance of evidence. Rose vs. Shaw, 144 La. 571, 80 South. 727; C. C. 2232.
The plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rose v. ShawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Jackson v. BelingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
- Theriot v. ChaudoirSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Eye v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Lazarus v. NewmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mournet v. SumnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hinton v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Young v. Sentry Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Joynes v. Toye Bros. Auto & Taxicab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Gradney v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.