Legal Opinion

United States v. Arturo De La Vega, Raimundo Betancourt, Ricardo Aleman, Mario Carballo and Osvaldo Coello

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 2, 1990No. 88-5166PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge:

This is the consolidated appeal of five individuals who, based upon their involvement in what was dubbed the “Miami River Cops Case”, were convicted of various offenses under the federal racketeering, narcotics, civil rights and tax laws. On appeal, they raise numerous arguments challenging their convictions or sentences. 1 We affirm the convictions of all appellants but vacate the sentences of appellants Be-tancourt and De La Vega and remand them for re-sentencing.

I

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The investigation by Metro-Dade Homicide Detectives of the causes of death…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United States v. Dustin John HiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Ervin Jahue Blevins, United States of America v. Joel Amos Mitchell, United States of America v. Dewey Glen JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. CampaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Don Eugene SiegelmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API