Migdal, Pollack & Rosenkrantz LLP v. Coleman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*379OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
The key issue presented on this motion by defendant for summary judgment is whether the arbitration requirements for attorney-client matrimonial fee disputes set forth in part 136 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (the Rules; 22 NYCRR part 100 et seq.) apply when the total fee charged for services rendered in a domestic relations matter exceeds the sum of $100,000, but the amount that may be owing for such services at the time of commencement of a lawsuit to recover for such fees is less than that amount.
In its complaint the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Julien v. MachsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Herrick v. LyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Paikin v. TsirelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Scordio v. ScordioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edelman v. PosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010