Legal Opinion
Michael Hogue and Carol Hogue v. United Olympic Life Insurance Company, Delaware Administrators, and Consultants & Administrators, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1995No. 93-5435PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Michael and Carol Hogue appeal the judgment of the district court dismissing their claims resulting from the termination of their insurance policy with United Olympic Insurance Company. For the following reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
BACKGROUND
Michael and Carol Hogue were insured by United Olympic Life Insurance Company (“United Olympic”). Their policy was part of a large group of policies in what was called the “Med-Preference” or “Med-Choice” Trust (“the Old Trust”). On July 1,1990, the Hogues’ health insurance premiums were increased by 18…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- William F. Callejo, Individually and as Trustee, and Adelfa B. Callejo, as Trustee v. Bancomer, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Bobby Thrash, Sr. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Reeves v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jack G. Kelly v. Charles C. Foti, Jr., City of New Orleans, John Doe, and Jane RoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Cortez v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Antonio Cortez v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Antonio Cortez v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Hogue (Michael, Carol) v. United Olympic Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995