Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Ricard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1986No. 85 CA 1016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge.

This is a boundary action brought by Norbert J. Hurst and his co-owners in indi-visión against Evelyn Vallet Ricard and her co-owners in indivisión to fix the boundary between two tracts of land on the lower Chenal of False River, Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.

The basic issue is whether the side bounds of two contiguous tracts of land on the concave side of a curve in what was a navigable stream should be parallel or converging when the property description of the property first sold from a common ancestor in title fails to state which is the case. The trial court held the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ramos Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Minor v. DaspitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Bergeron v. DaspitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Marmiche v. CommagereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1828

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurst v. RicardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Hurst v. RicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Hurst v. RicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Hurst v. RicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API