Legal Opinion
Interior by Mussa, Ltd. v. Town of Huntington
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 20, 1997PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously reversed without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated.
Plaintiff commenced suit against defendant municipality seeking a refund of a building application fee in the sum of $9,461.
By way of verified complaint filed November 25, 1995, plaintiff alleged that on or about April 13, 1990, it filed an application with defendant seeking a building permit for a certain parcel of property located in Commack, New York. Said application was accompanied by a fee in the sum of $9,461. According to the complaint, "for reasons unknown to Plaintiff,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parsa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bankers Trust Co. v. CerratoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- 9310 Third Avenue Associates, Inc. v. Schaffer Food Service Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Board of Education of the Cold Spring Harbor Central School District v. RettaliataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Stanford Heights Fire District v. Town of NiskayunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by15 opinions
- Picard Ex Rel. Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC v. Madoff (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Mazzola v. Roomster Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- High View Fund, L.P. v. HallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Grgurev v. LiculDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Brewer v. Village of Old FieldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.