Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kelly

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 11, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The mere fact that a legal contention is unprecedented is, of course, not conclusive as to its deficiency in merit. There is, on the other hand, however, no inference to be indulged that an individual attorney has discovered in the mountain of legal lore a vein of gold the existence of which was previously wholly unsuspected by the vast army of his contemporaries and predecessors.

The present petitioner is the widow of the testator who died m July of 1939 and whose will was admitted to probate in the latter part of the succeeding December. This will was executed in October, 1937,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Doe ex dem. Shelton v. CarrolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  3. In re Franklin Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Falvey v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. Simmons v. Lyle's adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. CarruthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API