Legal Opinion

Kleine v. Houk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1922No. 11,080PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

— This was an action by the appellant against the appellee, a physician, to recover damages for alleged malpractice in setting a broken arm.

The complaint which was in one paragraph was answered by a general denial. The issues thus formed were submitted to a jury for trial. At the conclusion of appellant’s evidence the appellee tendered and requested the court to instruct the jury to find for the appellee. Thereupon the appellant moved the court to instruct the jury peremptorily to find in his favor. The court denied said motion of appellant and sustained the said motion of the appellee. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deeter v. BurkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goings v. Davis, DirectorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Michigan Cent. R.R. Co. v. Spindler, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. KlingeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Cooper v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. McKinney v. CrawfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API