Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Law Enforcement Officers Union, District Council 82 v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1997Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Carpinello, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

Because the effect of the majority’s decision is not merely the invalidation of a regulation, but the de facto permanent prohibition of double celling in existing State prisons, I am *293constrained to dissent. I do not believe that petitioners, who seek to nullify 9 NYCRR 7621.5 (hereinafter the final rule), have met their heavy burden of showing that same is "unreasonable and unsupported by any evidence” (Matter of Consolation Nursing Home v Commissioner of N. Y. State Dept. of Health, 85 NY2d 326, 332 [emphasis supplied]).

The record…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York State Ass'n of Counties v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Consolation Nursing Home, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Ayers v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. MATTER OF MEM'L HOSP. v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Dorst v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API